|
|
How does efficacy of HW-CFLs compare to other light sources?
High-wattage compact fluorescent lamps (HW-CFL) have similar luminous efficacies to other compact fluorescent lamps, electrodeless fluorescent lamps, and metal halide (MH) sources. Their efficacies far exceed high-wattage incandescent sources. Figure 4 shows comparisons to these and other light sources.
| Figure 4. Efficacy of various light sources |
Adapted from: Rea MS (ed.). 2000. IESNA Handbook, ninth edition. 26-3.
New York: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America; and catalog
information for electrodeless fluorescent and HW-CFL products |
NLPIP tested five HW-CFL samples for luminous flux and power, which were used to calculate luminous efficacy as a spot check to manfuacturers’ claimed luminous efficacy ratings (see Appendix B: Power and light output of HW-CFLs). Although some of the products had slightly lower light output than their manufacturers’ ratings, all required less power than the manufacturers’ wattage rating. As a result, NLPIP determined that all were near the expected efficacies based on the manufacturers’ ratings (Figure 5). All samples were tested in a vertical base up position with ambient temperature of 77°F (25°C).
| Figure 5. Rated vs. NLPIP-tested efficacy of five HW-CFL samples |
*When manufacturers did not explicitly report efficacy, NLPIP calculated efficacy by dividing initial lumens by nominal wattage. |
|